We have approximately 500 Peplink controllers currently deployed and would like to move almost 300 additional sites to Peplink controllers. However, the inControl reporting features are lacking in what we dial into for reporting as they only show a total grouping of users. We have certain statically set servers on a separate sub-net that we would like to have excluded from reporting. We do not want to have a server as a top client when we are trying to show how much data our guest users have passed through.
In addition, we have some controller functionality at these other sites we would like to migrate over that has built-in ICMP monitoring directly from the existing controller. Since we do not have a stand-alone box that does this, and was included with the current controller, we cannot use Peplinks at these many sites. If there was a way to have even simple ICMP monitoring by IP for server/switching status we could easily migrate these sites to Peplinks. These specific sites are very large existing infrastructure sites, and we like the large availability of reporting features the Peplink controllers, as well as inControl, have and would like to make use of these features without forgoing or existing site reporting.
Does Peplink have any plans to bolster their reporting features with more granular settings? And do you have plans to make use of features for IP monitoring of servers by ICMP?