Hello, we’re a small production house based in south east asia, and we’re working to bring live-streaming to areas where physical network is not available (ie. using 4G networks). However since bandwidth and reliability aren’t ideal, we looked for solutions and speedfusion bonding caught our attention. I’m not a network guru so please forgive me if our plan doesn’t make sense
A simple illustration: https://i.imgur.com/lhgD9et.jpg
We’ll build a speedfusion VPN from “Router #1” in a remote location to “Router #2” in a our production facility. Router #1 is connected to the internet via three 4G modems (bandwidth bonding), and Router #2 is connected to the internet via two DSL modems (simple failover). Packets will be sent/received from Router #1 to the Streaming CDN via Router #2.
Here are some questions
Would our plan work?
We’re planning to purchase a Peplink Balance 380 router as “Router #1” (which support bonding with 3 wan ports). My question is about “Router #2”, since all we need is a simple failover, do we need to purchase a bonding-supported router, or a cheaper one like Peplink Balance 20 would suffice? (cost is obviously a factor here)
I just read about fusion hub, would it makes more sense than hosting my own VPN in this application?
I know Peplink also have a “MAX” product line for 4G sticks, but seeing we already have capable 4G modems (which supports ethernet connection) and the compexity of 4G sticks (compatibility would be a concern), would it make more sense for us to invest in a general-purpose bonding device (eg. Balance 380), or is there any advantage to get a 4G bonding device (eg. MAX HD4)?
Thanks for helping out!