Is there a plan to support something like “dynamic VPN” in the future?
The idea would be to permit generate direct SF tunnels on demand between remote sites to serve as a shortcut and avoid extra bandwidth consumption on the central hub. (SF Bonding is great but customer always want more efficiency)
I understand that we can use different route costs between peers, so we can use a shorter route in a fully meshed topology, but it also demands to use big balance models because of the amount limits in speedfusion peers.
Also, in a dynamic VPN environment we could use smaller devices (BPL-210) at remote branches with the main SF tunnel to central office and the option to create 1 or 4 more tunnels directly to other remote branches… This way we can have a star topology supported with direct tunnels with spokes when needed.