Balance 1350 EC SpeedFusion 1000Mbps Bottleneck using 10G Interfaces

Product Discussion Peplink Balance
, , ,
1

Hi Peplink Support,

I have a Balance 1350 EC with a 2 Gbps license. I am using an SFP+1 10G module and an SFP+3 10G module, both connected to a Cisco 9300 with an 8-port 10G module linked to the internet. However using SpeedFusion; my maximum speed is only 937 Mbps .
I get the same result with or without SpeedFusion. The goal is to get over SpeedFusion 1900 Mbps Download and 100 Mbps Upload

Any ideas?

Here is my Switch:
TenGigabitEthernet1/1/2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Ten Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0045.1de4.70b6 (bia 0045.1de4.70b6)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not set
Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is SFP-10GBase-SR

TenGigabitEthernet1/1/8 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Ten Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0045.1de4.70bc (bia 0045.1de4.70bc)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not set
Full-duplex, 10Gb/s, link type is auto, media type is SFP-10GBase-SR

2

What’s on the other end of the tunnel?

3

SpeedFusion HUB over a 10G Fiber link 1ms delay, then an Ubuntu Server with iPerf3 4vCPUs-16GBRAM

4

Peplink recommends an 8 core fusionhub for 1Gbps (c4.2xlarge) so I imagine you need more CPU power to hit 2Gbps.

1 Like
5

Hi Andrew,

I upgraded from 4vCPUs on the Peplink Fusion Hub to 8vCPUs and 16GBRAM as suggested and still same results.

6

Download Only

image
image704×363 46.2 KB

7

Uploading Only

image
image709×366 46.4 KB

8

bi-directional Traffic. - TX-RX

image
image700×361 46.5 KB