Hello Team,
I hope all of you are doing very well.
I would like to be advised on the best way to do bonding. Below is the scenario:
WAN--------------------------
CELLULAR----------------------UBR LTE
WIFI-as-WAN-------------------
Is it good to bond the three in High Priority 1 ?
I would need your candid and the best advise on this please.
Thanks
My answer would be “maybe” or “probably.” One must pay attention to differences in latencies and the throughput of the different WANs. Peplink provides useful guidance in its WhitePaper which is worth reading. Typically terrestrial WANs do not vary in performance to a huge degree over short periods of time but cellular may. And wi-fi-as-WAN runs the gamut from excellent to horrible/useless. My advice would be to try it and start with “dynamic weighted bonding.” Some diddling with parameters will likely be required to optimize. My experience is that bonding the connections will mitigate packet loss and protect against WAN outages but the degree to which an increase in throughput will be achieved will be largely determined by the nature of your WANs and your settings. As to the latter, we have some sterling examples where the throughputs were summed in “textbook” fashion and others where the differences in WANs was so great it was impossible to aggregate bandwidth in any manner.
so then you likely want to use Speedfusion Smoothing not bonding. read up on it, and past threads. its easy to setup, and works wonders when you have unstable WANs, joining multiple together to create a stable WAN. just note that packets get duplicated so if you have bandwidth caps, you must configure efficiently.