Hi Peplink Team,
We have received a request from a potential customer about additional Syslog messages that would help
them understand exactly what’s going on with Balance VRRP status.
What are the odds of getting the following requests implemented in the next firmware and if they’re acceptable,
then about when will it be released to the public?
#Requests
- Send easy to understand Failover/Rollback from/to Master/Slave msg
- Send syslog msg when a slave unit’s power goes down
- Send syslog msg when a slave unit’s WAN link goes down
- Set multiple Syslog servers to give customers more flexibility
All the syslog messages I see are as follows:
#The customer is evaluating Balance1350 but the following is from Balance380.
But I’d think that all the messages are the same across all Balance models?
==
<1>Jul 23 06:41:49 balance: System started 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:41:50.570 > Slave Powered UP
<2>Jul 23 06:41:53 balance: System: Changes applied 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:41:54.922 > Config sync to from Master?
<3>Jul 23 06:44:29 balance: System: Changes applied 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:44:31.538
<4>Jul 23 06:45:48 balance: WAN: WAN 1 disconnected (No cable detected) 192.168.1.1 23/07 15:45:52.531 > Master WAN1 Down
<5>Jul 23 06:45:57 balance: System: Changes applied 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:46:00.962 >Slave activates
<6>Jul 23 06:47:13 balance: System: Time synchronization successful 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:47:14.043
<7>Jul 23 06:48:22 balance: WAN: WAN 1 disconnected (WAN failed DNS test) 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:48:23.278
<8>Jul 23 06:48:32 balance: WAN: WAN 1 connected (203.143.104.129) 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:48:33.701
<9>Jul 23 06:48:49 balance: WAN: WAN 1 disconnected 192.168.1.2 23/07 15:48:51.339
<10>Jul 23 06:53:35 balance: WAN: WAN 1 connected (203.143.104.129) 192.168.1.1 23/07 15:53:43.137 > Master WAN1 back to Active
<11>Jul 23 06:54:10 balance: WAN: WAN 1 disconnected (WAN failed DNS test) 192.168.1.1 23/07 15:54:17.867
<12>Jul 23 06:54:24 balance: WAN: WAN 1 connected (203.143.104.129) 192.168.1.1 23/07 15:54:32.339
Hope his request makes sense to you.
Many thanks in advance for your comment!
Best regards,
Takashi Nishihara