Background
- A set of static unencrypted SpeedFusion connections from a site (Balance 380, #1) to HQ (Balance 380, #2)
- A mobile device (#3) connected by encrypted SpeedFusion connection to HQ (#2)
Question
When mobile device #3 connects to the LAN of #1, is there a way for the #3<->#2 SpeedFusion connection to be maintained (or established) within the #1<->#2 SpeedFusion connection?
Essentially, tunneling between #3 and #2 occurring within the tunnels of #1 to #2.
I expect the answer is “no,” but if there are clever ways to achieve this then that’ll make us happy.
Use case
We want to maintain the benefit of the encryption plus the routing of the #3<->#2 connection as the physical connection of #3 changes, while adding the improved infrastructure of the #1<->#2 infrastructure when it becomes available to #3 (via the connection to the LAN of #1)