Add IKEv2 to IPSEC VPN

[monacense]

IKEv2 needed here too …

[GVIT-Mahdi]

Bump… needed by most organizations nowadays.

[ppgaust]

Hi All

Is Peplink support Azure site to site VPN now ?

[TK_Liew]

@ppgaust

Hi All

Is Peplink support Azure site to site VPN now ?

I have feedback here.

[z3roCoo1]

Just setup an IPsec VPN to a customers ASA and they were very disappointed that IKEv2 was not supported. Needless to say, it does not reflect well on us. So another +1 for this feature.

[pepnet_allan]

We also have a request for this feature from a large client. +1 to this feature

[Ayman_Dasa]

Hi All

Is Peplink support Azure site to site VPN (dynamic routing with IKE v2) now ?

[TK_Liew]

@Ayman_Dasa

Hi All

Is Peplink support Azure site to site VPN (dynamic routing with IKE v2) now ?

We target to support IKEv2 in v7.1.0. Anyway, dynamic routing will not be supported.

[wyzkburz]

+1 for IKEv2…GCP/GCE supports IKEv1 but it is limited to a single tunnel. With multiple, non-contiguous/adjacent subnets, the configuration we require is next to impossible to implement. IKEv2 support is standard on most other platforms and should be a priority for PepLink.